If Only Jurors Had Been Able to Watch All of Fists of Fury 4, They Might Have Started To Like It
|
Written by mike
|
|
Wednesday, 18 June 2008 10:37 |
 The creepy man in the white cowboy hat, Max Hardcore, filed a motion for a new trial today after being convicted of obscenity in a Florida court earlier this month. Among his rationales, the much-contested decision of the judge not to force the jurors to watch all the footage from the five videos, including Golden Guzzlers 7, Max Extreme 20 and Fists of Fury 4, in their entirety.
US law requires that in order for something to be deemed obscene (and thus banned), the material "must be taken as a whole," a standard originally imposed so that, you know, they don't end up banning a book like Tropic of Capricorn based on just the sexy bits.
In the Hardcore trial, jurors reacted poorly to watching so much footage of the ever resourceful Max fisting girls in smeared make-up and pissing on them while they cried, so the prosecutors pushed for an exemption after a few hours. We're all for freedom of speech, but somehow we're doubtful that granny would have changed her mind after watching twelve more hours of women getting fucked with baguettes.
RELATED:
Trial Testimony: Pee Videos More Popular Than David Cook
|
Tweet me!
Comments