Jarec Wentworth Pleads Not Guilty To Extortion; Who Is D.B.?!?!?

Jarec Wentworth a.k.a. Teofil Brank pleaded not guilty to the federal extortion charges against him today, as XBIZ is reporting. Wentworth stands accused of extorting $500,000 and an Audi R8 worth $180,000, all from a likely rich and well known Hollywood man with whom he had likely had sex for money.

The story broke last weekend on Str8UpGayPorn and the extortion scheme only dates back to mid-February when Brank began threatening this man, identified in court documents with the initials D.B., with exposure via his Twitter account. His initial demands of $500,000 and the Audi were met, but he proceeded to get greedy and ask for $1 million more, as well as a condo in L.A. saying things like “I want this over ASAP like yesterday.”

Per XBIZ, no trial date has been set, but Brank has been meeting with federal public defenders who “asked the court to allow bail, stating that it would be unlikely Wentworth would be a flight risk because the Justice Department was able to freeze all of his bank accounts after he was arrested.”

Also, Wentworth/Brank sounds fucking scary. Listen to this:

FBI agents, who acted as D.B.’s associates, arranged a meeting with Wentworth at the Grove, a Los Angeles shopping destination near the city’s famed Farmer’s Market, but later chose a Manhattan Beach Starbucks to hand over cash and title to the Audi.

At the Starbucks, FBI agents found a loaded .357 Magnum revolver with additional ammunition in Wenworth’s car, a 2014 Ford hatchback.

Wow.

For now he remains in the Los Angeles Metropolitan Detention Center awaiting a decision about bail.

But who is D.B.?!? David Beckham!? Anyone?

And Men.com just released what might be his final scene shot with them (though reps from Mindgeek have not confirmed whether they have anything else with him in the can or not), which is this fuck show with Colt Rivers called Forever.


2

1

3

4

5

26

31

36

40

47

43

54

58

62

75

83

87

91

98

 

 

[Men.com: Forever]
[XBIZ]

Previously: AFTER JAREC WENTWORTH, THE SIX MOST NOTORIOUS GAY PORN CRIMES

 

42 thoughts on “Jarec Wentworth Pleads Not Guilty To Extortion; Who Is D.B.?!?!?”

  1. Well its certainly not David Beckham as he definitely does not need to pay for sex and not even in Jarek’s wildest dreams. Anyway with Jarek in jail now waiting for bail that ain’t gonna happen he’s probably having to give sex for free to everyone that threatens him. He started as a bottom and now he’ll finish as a continuous bottom.

    1. 1) The relationship between Jarek and the victim was not escort to client. Jarec to victim: “You lied to me and treated me like Shit. … I only wanted to drive cars and Enjoy your company. I guess findin you boys is out of the picture.”
      2) Jarek is in detention awaiting trial. It’s called “pretrial detention.” The trial setting conference was held Friday, March 27.
      3) You watch too many prison movies.
      4) Jarek began his porn career as a top, not as a bottom.

  2. Somehow I find that MEN scene with Jarec and Colt especially hot because I know these guys are good friends, even though one is gay and the other not.

    1. That dovetails nicely with what someone observed at the Trial Setting Conference held Friday, 3/27:

      The victim’s attorney was present. He addressed the court and convinced the judge to have the victim’s name redacted from the trial conference proceedings.

      The victim’s attorney is a former U.S. Attorney and former Chief of the Major Frauds Section of the Central District court.

  3. Afro Puerto Rican

    I had a big crush on Jarec Wentworth aka Teofil Brank. On screen he appeared to be a nice funny guy with a sense of humor. He was everything I wanted in a man, handsome, masculine, tall, funny, and sexy. If these allegationsa are true about him, he deserve to serve time in prison and I’ve loss respect for him as a human being. If Jarec goes to jail, with his good looks, he’s going to get raped and become someone’s bottom guy in prison. Mostly likely he will get it raw in jail.

    1. I feel as disillusioned as you do, and this morning was asking myself and had to Google ‘who was the last one in messy trouble like this?’ Mike Dozer, back at the start ’14, with his penchant for jailbait ages. And before that, Robert Van Damme locked up with a 10 year sentence after some international manhunting.
      *
      It’s too easy, when they’re so good looking and fuel our dreams, to forget we know nothing about them but that we’re attracted to them. As professionally made as porn now is and the profit it makes, it does not have the legitimacy among other entertainment forms it constantly craves. It’s only question seems to be ‘are you willing to have sex in front of cameras and do you look good doing it?’ Quality of character isn’t material. Hell, just the fact that the overwhelming majority of them don’t work under the real names is our constant reminder this isn’t work or fame they want to take with them the rest of their lives.

  4. I don’t know why sites keeps saying that this could be his last. A quick check on men.com/scenes/upcoming shows that there are at least two other videos in the pipeline for next week. One of those videos appears to be a serialized one.

    1. I’m going to favor your D.B.assessment,…. since Mr. Burns have been photographed with other SC Models (e.g. ASHTON) and has a lot more to lose in a pornography scandal since he’s running for the US President seat on the Republican ticket. He’s also a millionaire with lots money dripping out of his butt-hole and as a candidate can easily acquire FBI intervention paid by the taxpayers.

  5. There’s at least two scenes yet to come with Luke Adams on the 29th and Chris Harder on 4/01. We might be forgiven for suspecting the worse the details get, the faster Men empties the can and disassociates itself.

  6. Who says it has to be an actor? It could be a politician, a silicon valley up and cummer, or maybe even an athlete. I wonder if the guy he blackmailed is a nice guy or an asshole. If the guy is a creep like a homophobic republican politician, then I could understand how Jarec would have no qualms blackmailing him.

    1. He is an openly gay republican with lots of money and free time to fuck with porn performers and gay prostitutes. He isn’t famous and doesn’t have a lot of clout. He probably gave the money and car as a gesture of goodwill and Jarek, thought it would be okay to ask for more. He should have cut off at that point, but persisted to bother him until he gave more. At that time, the person went to the authorities because Jarek took photos and pics and threatened to publish them.

      They were probably just selfies and stuff, but Jarek being straight, he didn’t care for him or the money he got scott free for NOT having to bottom. Dude should have been thankful.

      HE sounds like a real peach, he stood up in court and ranted like an asshole for when the judge asked for an answer of not guilty or guilty.

      Part of me thinks he should have his ass handed to the system on a platter – given to a bunch of homophobic inmates for a bit of humble pie. We’ll have to see how this plays out.

      1. If it’s the person mentioned above, he was in a picture with another gay pornstar, so I don’t understand why he would be scared about pictures of him getting out, unless they are of him naked or in more compromising positions. Even though he is a republican, he contributed $400,000 to fight amendment 2 in Florida, which was an amendment to define marriage in the state constitution to one man and one women. It seems he isn’t a closet case and is in fact open about who he is. FYI, I just figured out there is a republican politician with the initials D.B. David Burns is a senator from Maine… so, this D.B. could be anybody.

        1. That is what the case is about, this guy’s sexually graphic photos were kept by Jarek and was meant to be private.

  7. Kind of fitting that the last scene of his to be released is called: “Forever” … As if we’ll never see Jarec in porn again, or out of a jail cell again…

  8. David Boreanaz? Dave Bautista? David Bowie? David Blaine? Daniel Bryan? (Although Daniel Bryan’s real name is Bryan Danielson. So he might not count.) Hmmm…

    1. so you say you know? i wont ask who but could you say if you think most people would know this person, or would you say most people probably would not?

        1. kev, do not assume that Zach does not edit the documents he posts.

          The unredacted original court document (the Indictment) refers to the victim only by the 11-character text “victim D.B.”

          Despite Str8UpGayPorn’s boast of “No Agendas. No Censors.” Zach himself redacted every instance of “victim D.B.” from the publicly available court document he posted.

          Do not assume that the statements Zach makes about the case are factual or even that they are credible conclusions that can be drawn from the publicly available court documents he posts in order to lend credibility to his statements and attract readers.

          Zach keeps making incorrect statements about the case and offering his own ridiculous speculations as though they were fact.

          You need not depend on Zach for news about the case. Anyone can obtain copies of the court documents from the federal judiciary’s online PACER service at http://www.pacer.gov Anyone can register for PACER. The charge is 10 cents per page and is billed to your credit card quarterly.

        2. There is much incorrect infomation and nonsense speculation being published about the case by Str8UpGayPorn, then being gobbled up and regurgitated by other publications as though it were the gospel truth.

          1) Jarec did not plead guilty. When asked to enter a plea with respect the charge in the Indictment, he started to make a statement about the Indictment but was cut off by the judge, who entered a “not guilty” plea on his behalf.
          2) We don’t know that no trial date has been set. A Trial Setting Conference was set for 10:30 AM, Friday, 3/27/2015. The minutes from the conference haven’t been entered into PACER yet.
          3) FBI agents did not act as D.B.’s associates. A single undercover agent posed as a friend of the victim.
          4) It was Wentworth, not FBI agents, who instructed the victim, via text message, to meet him at the Grove.
          5) In response to Wentworth’s message, the victim, under direction from the FBI, requested Wentworth meet at Starbucks with a “trusted friend” of the victim.
          6) The Starbucks was located in El Segundo, not Manhattan Beach.
          7) Wentworth expressed to the victim his concerns about the change in venue and the substitution of a “friend” of the victim: “I don’t wanna walk up there and f*ckin’ all of a sudden it’s the Fed or something or some bullsh*t, something happens and I’m f*ucked.” In response, the victim indicated that Wentworth could bring along a friend. So Wentworth, concerned for his own safety, asked his friend E.Y. to obtain a gun for him and drive him to the Starbucks.
          8) When they arrived at the Starbucks, E.Y. sent a message confirming their arrival. E.Y. remained in the car while Wentworth went into the Starbucks to meet with the victim’s “trusted friend.” The gun also remained in the car.
          9) After Wentworth’s arrest, FBI agents observed E.Y. sitting in a car parked in the Starbucks parking lot and asked his purpose there. He admitted driving Wentworth to the Starbucks, knowing about the extortion scheme, and obtaining a gun for Wentworth’s protection. Afterwards, agents searched the car and found “a Colt Magnum 357 revolver along with six rounds of Winchester .38 special ammunition.”
          10) Nothing in the court documents indicates that the gun was loaded. Finding “a … revolver along with six rounds of … ammunition” does not imply that the revolver was loaded. “Along with” does not mean the same as “loaded with.”
          11) Neither the gun nor any other weapon is mentioned in the Indictment, which only charges a violation of 18 UCS Section 875(d): “Whoever, with intent to extort from any person, firm, association, or corporation, any money or other thing of value, transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to injure the property or reputation of the addressee or of another or the reputation of a deceased person or any threat to accuse the addressee or any other person of a crime, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
          12) The discovery of the gun is completely irrelevant to the charge and to the sentencing. The charge carries a maximum prison term of 2 years. There is no statutory exception that could increase the prison term beyond 2 years, nor does the Court have any discretion to increase the prison term beyond 2 years.
          13) If the court follows the statutory sentencing guidelines, which take into account the nature of the offense (blackmail), the amounts demanded ($500K + $180K + $1M) and obtained ($500K + $180K), and the defendant’s criminal history (if any), he’d be sentenced to the 2-year maximum term and fined $10K to $100K. But if he can’t pay the fine, which seems likely, the fine would be waived. The court can also order him to pay restitution of the balance (if any) of the $500K that was not already recovered by the government.
          14) If the defendant pleads not guilty, thereby sparing the government and the court the time and expense of trial, the government might recommend a lighter sentence, maybe even probation. To approve the recommendation, the judge would have to ignore the statutory sentencing guidelines, but it’s within the court’s discretion to grant a lighter sentence.
          15) The Bail Review hearing is set for April 2.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top