Shocker: Corbin Fisher Faked Some Butt Sex

Eagle-eyed porn watchers have been going wild the last couple days over a few seconds of fuck footage from Corbin Fisher that blatantly shows that not all “fucking” involves actual fucking.

The scene in question is this one, released on Thursday, featuring hot and probably straight guys Colt and Truman.

It’s a ho-hum, fuck-on-a-weight-bench affair, and then around the 12-minute mark, there were a couple of brief shots that clearly showed Colt humping Truman with his hard dick clearly outside of Truman’s ass. A better cameraman would have caught this and moved over to the right, and a better editor would not have included the footage, but, there it is. Fake fucking! It happens.

The evidence, which has been GIF’d but which has since been edited out of the scene that’s online, as Men of Porn and its commenters eagerly report. But, according to commenter DaddyYankee at WayBig, there was also a shot of non-penetrative “fucking” at the 12:13 mark which is still there.

This was the one that was edited out, originally at the 13:20 mark.

corbin-fisher-fake

Some actual penetration obviously occurred here, as the stills below show. But I guess Truman just couldn’t quite handle that much dick! And his ass was tired. And the camera guy was tired.


corbin-fisher-fake-1
corbin-fisher-fake-2

[Corbin Fisher: Colt & Truman]
[Men of Porn]
[Way Big]

38 thoughts on “Shocker: Corbin Fisher Faked Some Butt Sex”

  1. You know when I read shit like this and see how the porn industry is scamming and insulting me as a gay man, I feel no guilt about illegal downloading.

  2. Hahahaha, gay men are so stupid, It’s all about supply and demand. The reason gay porn is INFESTED with these pseudo heterosexuals is because gay mewn salivate like pathetic dogs at the notion that someone might be ‘straight’. And yet, those very same pathetic homos press for Aaron Shock to come out of the closet and accuse him of being a closeted homo. Meanwhile, two men ENGAGING IN HOMOSEXUAL SEX ACTS, no, no those are heteros. Did anyone ever think that the ‘hetero’ schtick might be a marketing tool? That makers of pornography tell their performers to say they are straight in order to add market value to their product. Maybe not. Maybe one can in fact get boinked in the ass and keep a hard-on. God knows you could never pay me enough to have sex with a woman. At the very sifght of a naked chick my dick shrivels into my innards. But hey, they really are straight and viagra cures whatever makes you limp. In the end, it is gay men who perpetuate gay shame, homophobia and being chumps to a bunch of heteros. If anything it is THAT that makes me ashamed to be gay. Damn. Maybe then, there is truth to praying away the gay.

    1. Why is it that people like you like to put people into “buckets” with the use of labels? Many of the CF models would admit to being at least bi-sexual, bi-curious, or just plain sexual! Sex for many people like myself is a very complicated thing, so labeling of these guys should just be thrown out the window! I have heard that the CF guys don’t use Viagra either. Most of them will have sex with women in their personal lives but when they come to the studio, they can go wild. Most have something deep down inside of them where they enjoy sex with another guy, whether they just like to do something very naughty, dirty or just plain taboo! The more that most of these models do guy-guy sex, the more they grow to enjoy it.

      1. Yup. And you can pray away the gay too. Hell, nail pussy enough and you might convince yourself that, you too can be cured from being gay. It is not about putting people into buckets, it is about perpetuating gay shame, and reinscribing that people ‘choose’ to be gay, and only if they will it enough it can go away. Just like gay porno stars, it’s just a phase. Richard Cohen and Ann Coulter are right about that, and it is people like you that prove them right.

        1. Excuse me, but you know absolutely nothing about me! People who are constantly looking at people as a member of this group or that group, assigning all sorts of labels to them based on race, age, sexual orientation, etc. do nothing but divide people instead of unite people. You seem to be one of those people. The only label that I want attached to myself is “member of the human race.” Some people, by their actions, have trouble fitting into that category!

  3. Get ready for the FAKE BAREBACK scenes next. Digital technology in porn has gotten easier to come by and produce, so they will be blurred out any visible evidence of condoms and then falsely promote them as bareback when they are NOT.

  4. This is noteworthy sure but it shouldn’t be a surprise that this happens, and it’s quite funny that people are getting on a high horse about it. Porn isn’t about real sex, it’s about illusion and fantasy (especially these kind of companies).

    Fake sex, fake noises, fake whatever…if the end result is sexy I’m happy.

    1. Wow, you are EASY to please then. And you are probably a cheap date (= McDonald’s dinner date too!) Pornography can be defined as “movies, pictures, magazines, etc., that show or describe naked people or sex in a very open and direct way in order to cause sexual excitement.” If something is being faked (i.e. grinding/humping as a replacement of what the scene was billed as–bareback anal sex) then the scene is not sex in a very open or direct way. And talent requires that a porn star do what it takes to deliver on a scene. Relative to porn acting, however, one does not have a stunt man to fill in on the most rigorous physical elements of a scene, and in that vein, it is expected that a bottom can bottom. In this scene, it strongly appears that the bottom could not bottom for very long at all.

      1. Well, have you ever seen HOW a porn movie is really shot ? Do you think that if you should see it really as it is, you would still be excited ? I think I’ll go for the cheap date, at least he doesn’t seem to be delusional like you are. I’ll never understand why people give so much importance to details like that. It’s PORN.

        1. And you are probably a minute man in bed after your cheap date! All porn is not the same. If it were, there wouldn’t be something called the Grabbys for excellence in porn. All porn is not shot the same way either. Every studio does something a bit differently. And, yes, I have seen some porn shot.

      2. Easy to please? In contrast to some, absolutely. I certainly don’t get upset at the integrity of gay porn. I’m not looking to tick boxes before I’m able to jack off, or else cry “Oh he didn’t take a cock in his ass for at LEAST three minutes, my boner rates this 4/10!”. I want hot, passionate, sexy action…and I am more than aware that some of that action is going to be faked to make it as appealing as possible. That’s fine with me, and poor guys to whom it isn’t. The list of porn they can watch is painfully short.

        And yeah, I am a cheap date. I care more about the company than anything related to money or status, but then again I’m not a snob :)

        1. For some people, porn has to be really hot and convincing to really enjoy it man. And man, you should check out the website, as all the scenes are rated by fans on a 1-star to 5-star scale. So, fans do rank porn based on how hot they think it is! Not all porn is really “hot, passionate sexy action” as you like it to be, that’s reality man. And, yes, there is a time and place for a quickie McDonald’s meal, but fine dining is nice once in awhile too!

  5. WhaT I dont understand why their dicks were hard even if they were only kissing. Are they really straight or there was a woman in the background?

  6. That product you’d get when your trusted GAY PORN STUDIO only hires STRAIGHT ACTORS..So this was the fault of both CF and straight slaves like most gay american supporting them.

    1. Quinn has been with CF for over 2 years now and is openly gay. He has been extremely successful at CF! There have been a few other gay models to work for CF in the past, but Quinn by far has integrated into the CF scene so successfully. But, setting labels aside, there are many guys who are not 100% straight that can successfully make gay porn, and have done so for many studios. They just have to have the desire to get it on with a man and deliver the goods!!

      1. Thanks for the info, Im going to search for QUINN.. I used to be a fan of CF, their bisexual video was awesome the top guy with name Harper were really into the guy bottom and the blond girl equally.. What I wanted to see in a gay porn is an orgy with REAL GAY GUYS, I watched some but I was surprised they were old or maybe in the late 90’s or early 20’s but those guys maybe real gays I could see the passion.

    2. I see you’ve bought into the lie that straight men who are not incarcerated or hooked on drugs can and will have gay sex in order to pay the rent.. LOL Looks like the porn studios are winning with this fraud.

  7. Reality check to all the offended. Gay porn has been doing this for years. Cf is not the first nor last studio to do additional shots without actual fucking. But just like Ashley Simpson, they are the ones that got caught. Yes it was poor editing but stop acting like you’ve just been told there is no Santa! Porn is entertainment. At no point are you promised realism.

    1. UnofficialPornCritic

      Do you work for CF in Las VEGAS or something? Seems like you are bending over backwards to defend sloppy production and a poor choice of a model (Truman) in the first place. CF does very short scene shoots compared to the rest of the industry, 60-90 minutes on average. If a bottom can’t handle being topped for just a portion of that shoot time, then he doesn’t belong in this business. Sorry, but that’s reality!

      1. Every studio has had either a some video or photos faked. That is obvious… Their editors here just fucked up and exposed it. I feel bad for him.

      2. He’s not defending them.

        He’s saying other studios are doing it but haven’t been caught like Corbin Fisher has.

      3. I do not work for CF though I don’t think that’s a job I would hate going to. Can you put in a word for me? But I do find it hard to be mad at CF and so upset that a little trickery was used in my porn. But since you are let me be the person to burst your bubble.
        1) it used to be common practice to use stunt cocks and asses in scenes. Yes even the legendary Jeff Stryker has owned up to this.
        2) when a model pulls out and yells “I’m cumming”. There will undoubtedly be a cut to a different shot. The editor has cut out about ten minutes of the model jerking off – sometimes while watching tittie porn.
        3) scenes are shot over and over from different angles and altering the lighting. Those O faces you sometimes see are recreations to give you a close up since the cameraman only gets once chance to get the cum shot.
        4) these straight boys are enjoying sec with men as much as you would enjoy doing a woman.
        5) all movies whether porn or not use tricks to make you believe what they want you to believe. These are cleaned up using various methods such as editing or CGI or whatever method necessary. It used to be called movie magic. All that happened is that CF made an whoops and inadvertently gave you a peek behind the curtain.

        So no this doesn’t surprise, shock nor upset me and I don’t have to be on CF’s payroll to say that. But again, if they need a fluffer… Or just a towel man. I’m available.

        1. 1) Interesting that you have to go back 30 years ago to the pre-condom, pre-Internet days to cite the use of a stunt body part. In the present day of the Internet, porn shoots are much faster moving things, and from what is known about this studio, they only use the models it has set for the shoot, not stunt doubles/stunt double erotic body parts.
          2) Yes, invariably, when a model pulls out and says he is cumming, sometimes there is a lag time between that announcement and the cumshot, and sometimes there is not. That is not an issue, it also happens in real life sex. No biggie.
          3) Yes, almost anyone knows that scenes are shot using multiple cameras from different angles, that is a statement of the obvious to anyone who pays attention viewing a video.
          4) Some of the so-called “straight” boys can handle sex with men far better than others (and “straight” or “g4p” labels don’t really tell an accurate story about some of these models). Not all of the models are the same, each one is an individual with his own talents, fantasies and abilities. Some of the male models, have at least a bi-curious side or some are deep down inside bi-sexual where they really can get into sex with another guy, others really have to make the effort, and for those, it really is an effort and that shows. In this case, the bottom really didn’t look comfortable taking cock, and in my opinion, this really showed.
          5) The average shoot time for short scenes at this studio I have heard is usually short, maybe between an hour or two, not many hours and days as some people seem to think here. Being penetrated as a bottom for just a fraction of that short shoot time is not all that hard for someone who really belongs in a bottom role. Yes, everyone knows that some editing takes place for most every porn shoot, that is a given. Yes, sometimes there is filler, that is a given too. But when a shoot condenses 60+ minutes of shot video down to just 16 minutes of video, you would think for such a short video, there would be enough penetration footage available where splicing in a fake penetration clip in would not be necessary.

        2. @VegasRich – I stopped reading your comment when you referred to these gay porn actors as “Straight”. Please stop the tired fraud of trying to convince the world that these gay men who are eating butt holes and taking cocks are anything other than GAY.

          1. You were the one who referred to these guys being “straight” so you didn’t read my response far enough. Go back and read your earlier post man! I referred to them as “so-called ‘straight'” (meaning while they are often referred to as straight men, they can’t be completely straight, prefacing that these guys have to be at least bi-sexual or bi-curious at the very least to get into sex with another guy. Some of these guys will do anything sexually, so true labels of their sexual identity are murky and should probably be thrown out the window.

        3. Omfg shut the fuck up you are ruining the FANTASY for those of us who enjoy it .

          None of us were looking for a lecture or realism or for someone too pull whatever was behind the curtains out too tell us what its ALL ABOUT or what PORN entails.

          Its our FANTASY and your kind of comments are simply ruining it for those of us who just don’t give a shit period.

          Duh of course there are straight men who don’t like fucking men they are morons in my eyes always have been those kind of narrowminded sorority house jocks always disgust me .

          If these men aren’t open minded enough too actually try something different that they may possibly even enjoy then the onus is on them in that regard.

          I know this response is months later but give me a break with all that crap you are single handedly and INTENTIONALLY trying too ruin the fantasy element of porn for so many of us.

          Way too go champ! Ugh.

  8. UsedToLoveCorbinFisher

    I was once a huge Corbin Fisher fan, but these are the kinds of things that make me question their artistic integrity. After all, a company that is conscientious and concerned about putting out a good product would have some QA and QC over, first, having the correct models scheduled for the shoot who can actually deliver what is expected, and second, take the time to get things right. CF could learn something from studying W. Edwards Deming’s Total Quality Management! Yes, it can apply to porn production, which is a form of manufacturing.

    CF has been known to rush their scenes through, often filming them with no break at all, straight through, often in 60-90 minutes! This is like conveyor belt factory processed porn, and throws the artistic integrity of the business out the window in favor of making a quick product.

    Some of the Corbin Fisher models should never be cast for guy-guy scenes in the first place. If they are not that into this kind of sex, and can’t deliver a REAL performance that they are scheduled for, they should not be cast for the shoot, period!! Or, the shoot should have been cancelled or postponed until the model was ready. Perhaps Truman was not up for the task at hand, taking Colt’s above average cock, but then Truman should not have been cast for that role as a bottom if he just can’t handle it, even for just a portion of a 60-90 minutes of the shoot. This rather long portion of grinding (= “fake fucking”) is really, really bad, and there is simply no excuse for a major “professional” porn company to put out this kind of product, no matter how tired the model is. The time should have been taken to do this scene right. Instead, we see yet another porn company try to pull the wool over the eyes of its viewers and it shows with the bad editing.

    I just wonder how many Corbin fans will catch onto this and feel the same disappointment!

    1. Artistic integrity, seriously ? It’s PORN. Men fucking together. Many hours of mechanical shots, being told what they have to do and how they have to do it. Taking pills to keep a hard-on. So please, don’t call it “art”. It’s just a porn movie, something made for us to spend money on it while we are jerking off on scenes that looks plausible.

  9. This is of course extremely BAD of CF!!

    Sadly it´s probably not the 1st time in gay porn this has happened… If a model is able to bottom but the producer wants to make it easier for the bottoming model by faking – that´s of course totally unacceptable. If a model can´t bottom that particular day, the scene should be cancelled. And lastly – if a model always have very big problems bottoming he should not be hired at all, OR only be a top. Period.

    1. Obviously you’ve never got fucked in the ass for several hours at a time. And for that matter, the amount of time actually fucking is drastically shorter than what porn would depict. They do have to put in filler shots.

      While I don’t excuse a complete sham, where no penetration is occurring and it is advertised as porn, I do understand that shoots go for very long times and can really wear out models.

      1. UsedToLoveCorbinFisher

        I have been told by reliable sources that Corbin Fisher is known often to work straight through their shoots in 60-90 minutes without stopping. Not saying that this was the case here, but if the shoot was filmed in 60-90 minutes, less than half of that time would have included penetration, which is not very long. Truman just didn’t look into this type of sex at all, bottoming for another guy. Maybe it was Colt’s size, or more likely, this is just not really the thing Truman should be doing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top