CockYourVote: Cut or Uncut?

When it comes to fried chicken, most people agree the skin is the most delicious part. Many feel the same way about cocks. What say you?

According to Dr. Oz, Jews and many Muslims aside, circumcision is on the decline.

The percentage of US men who were circumcised rose steadily from about 30 percent in the 1930s to 90 percent in the 1970s.

Since then, the rate has been dropping: about 64% of American male infants were circumcised in 1995 and 62.3% in 2005.

cut2
Here at The Sword, of course, the question “To snip, or not to snip” has little to do with matters of health, cleanliness, and parental preference.

 
Tim Campbell fucks Jason Clark bareback belami
It’s about aesthetics.

 
michael del ray fucks jacob peterson gay porn
And form and function

 
ridder rivera fucks damien crosse barebackNot to mention, the men attached, or detached, from the skin as the case may be.

 
gay porn star jessie coulterAnd last but
never least, taste.

cut1
Now Cock Your Vote:

 
 

22 thoughts on “CockYourVote: Cut or Uncut?”

  1. It’s actually disingenuous to refer to a cock as “uncut”. This implies that the cock in reference was originally cut and now is somehow uncut. The correct term is “intact”.

    1. You know what’s actually disingenuous? Trying to make a semantic argument to support replacing standard usage of the language with politically correct terms.

  2. My dad tells the story about how their emergency obstetrician actually argued with him about my parents not wanting me cut and how he even attempted to do it without their permission too.
    Although dad finaly had to agree with the doc about wanting his son to be just like all the other boys, and just like all the other boys I was born with a foreskin and no sick pervert of a doctor was going to get his kicks by hacking the end of his infant son’s dick off!
    My father always delights in retelling how he both decked a doctor with one punch and never had to pay the hospital bill covering my birth.

  3. My brother was circumcise and I was not .I am happy that I was not being uncut is the best and especially when being with another man who enjoys it. Uncut stirs all my senses.

  4. My Dad was uncircumcised, but when I was born in 1955, my Mother, in collusion with her crazy obstetrician, had me circumcised (it was referred to as a medical procedure). In my opinion, circumcision is genital mutilation and should not be permitted to be performed routinely in any hospital. If, in later life, an adult male chooses circumcision for medical or other reasons, that’s a different case.

  5. I don’t think whether a cock is cut or uncut is what makes it attractive or not. I think the size, shape and upward curve of a cock is what makes it attractive or not.

  6. Not to make light of some real critical political and cultural issues… But I gotta say… All cocks matter. Lol Seriously… Why is this even a question? Cut or uncut are both hot to me, so why isn’t “both” an option on your survey?

    The bigger question is why do some men get snipped in the first place? Religion and pseudo science are not good enough reasons to alter someone’s anatomy, particularly against their will as it’s usually done to babies. I am cut and while I’m not crying in a corner about it, I suppose I wonder if my cock would be more sensitive with foreskin. Not the end of the world and I enjoy sex normally, but it’s stupid to do it unless it’s actually medically necessary.

  7. there’s also a serious autonomy issue involved: boys should have a say in the disposition of their bodies.

  8. circumcision = mutilation.

    we get our panties all tied up in a knot over female circumcision in the Muslim world, yet think nothing of subjecting boys to a painful (yes!), traumatic procedure on their second or third day of life!

    the dispensation of Christ freed Christians from this barbaric practice:

    For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.

    (Galatians 6:15)

    I used to think it was an earnest if misguided attempt to prevent STIs. But the true rationale for the widespread modern procedure was to protect against something far worse: boys engaging in morally degenerative acts of self-gratification! It was endorsed by no less a physician than Sir Joseph Lister (as in Listerine).

    1. so your saying getting a mole removed is the same as removing a tumor from the inside of a body? p.s. ask anyone in medical fields. more young boys get infections as well as old men. do you know about how many old men have to get at least some form of a circumcision because of swelling brought on by disease? Did you know it is an actual fact that your sti chances are much higher if uncut.
      Either way you should just know the truths because both have serious repercussions.

  9. People get up in arms about genital mutilation for girls. The person’s who are.in favor
    Say it’s cultural. The mutilation of household be illegal. Don’t hiide behind religion.I still haven’t for my mutilation.I told her it was my body.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top