Even More Video, Photos Of Bel Ami’s Mick Lovell

Bel Ami just sent out yet another video and yet more photos of Mick Lovell (see the first video here and the first photos here), and this is all just fucking insane.

I don’t think there’s ever been this much hype over someone whose actual work hasn’t even been released yet, but I am FINE with contributing to it because JESUS LOOK AT HIM. In case you forgot, the 6’1″ blue-eyed, well-hung angel comes from heaven Salt Lake City, is a Mormon, and has spent the past year “training” with Bel Ami in Eastern Europe.

Mick Lovell’s solo comes out next week on the 21st, and his hardcore bottoming debut (rfigur3figuyr3fg7u84r3f!@#@!!) the week after. Join Bel Ami here, and have your last will and testament ready, because you will die. I’ve died three times in the last week alone.

Preview clip (full scene goes live on December 21st):

 

[Bel Ami: Mick Lovell]

 

21 thoughts on “Even More Video, Photos Of Bel Ami’s Mick Lovell”

  1. If I had a nickel for every generic model in Bel Ami’s vapid coterie…

    I know that the company is Slovakian and I understand that traditionally its models come from Central Europe, but I’m over it. I’ll stop short of accusing the studio or its bombastic founder George Duroy of supremacism, but BA’s films and models remind me a bit of Abercrombie & Fitch in the 90’s or Calvin Klein in the 80’s. Aspirational lifestyle as a brand is one thing when it just encourages the buying of unnecessary products as a Tao to the personal fulfillment of consumers. But BA’s “product” isn’t a piece of vintage luggage or a Jacquard duvet. If this was the case, then ‘the good life’ would only require the purchase of goods. Instead, BA seems to be telling its audience that ‘the good life” is only possible when you have a certain shade of skin, a certain coiffure of hair, and a certain shape of body.

    But one cannot buy skin.

    That a media company in the sex industry could be so lacking in diversity, so deficient in body- and sex-positivism and yet still be lauded by their peers as much as BA is gives me pause. The homogeneous look of BA’s models suggests an orientation toward repression and control of sexuality. The aesthetic of BA’s films are informed more by a Western Christian construction of patriarchy than a modern and egalitarian understanding of cultural diversity. The fact that they produce gay films is an irony that makes me wonder about the future of gay liberation. But, hey, who needs liberation from social and cultural oppression when you have inherited wealth, flaxen hair and eight-pack abs?

    Mick Lovell is good-looking boy; he is beautiful to many. (Although I find his body to be a skosh out of proportion and his hair to be a bit over-styled.) But he’s been so praised as a vision of angelic innocence and Malachian perfection that when he was finally raw-dogged by Manuel Rios (a Slovak, not a Latino) gay porn bloggers reacted as though the Morning Star itself had fallen. If, of course, the Morning Star had cut his teeth jerking off on webcam.

    BA might be a well-marketed studio, and marketing makes good business and can set prevailing fashions, but it doesn’t always make good art. Or even good internet porn.

  2. one of the lost boys…..mormons toss their boys aside who dont honor their rules……i bet he was found on the street homeless…….i hope this brings him some normalcy and peace.

  3. The head-tilt-to-the-side in almost every picture is annoying once you’ve noticed it.
    Lovely cock though, I’d let that destroy me.

  4. too good for porn,not good enough for modelling…i almost feel bad.
    it’s like losing the lottery for one single number.

    1. I’d love for you to tell me what’s “not good enough” about him for modeling. He’s literally flawless from head to toe.

      1. I’m talking about money,real fashion modelling and making real money there.
        He’s as i said almost too beautiful for porn but it’s a pity he’s a step behind real models.You can argue that many high profile models aren’t as hot or sexy but the ugliest of them makes in one month what the hottest porn model probably makes in a year and it’s a damn pity considering also what many porn models have to face because of it and the risks they take.

        1. When it comes to the men, nobody’s making a killing in modelling. Any brief googling will tell you it’s guys who live 5 and 6 to an apartment, getting compensated in flights & clothes instead of real money. Unless you’re famous enough to have your own endorsements, porn may (in fact) be the higher paying profession.

          1. I don’t need to google.I’m talking about high fashion models,top 200 male models…can be kids aged 17,and can make even 50k for an adv campaign,500euros for a catwalk and considering they usually do 50 to 80 during every fashion week around the world you do the math,add editorials,add a moltitude of semi unknown brands’ catalogs and lookbooks,adv(for that they can be paid 300-500 euros every 6 hours or if you’re in the top 100; per hour,they make 10 brands a month so you again do the math.
            althou far less paid then their female collegues,their yearly income can reach 200k to 500…17 yo kids!
            Flights and clothing is a surplus for them,as everybody else working “backstage” usually gets.They have contracts with agencies and managers who get a cut so its in their best interest to make them work,besides they are kids,even if they are very well paid they tend to share flats smoke weed and look like a mess lol…so there is no chance for the hottest more famous model in gay porn,even if he escorts to reach their yearly income and lifestyle.It’s a difficult life,some struggle but it’s still light years better than gay porn.

        2. I love how you say “hot” “sexy” and “ugly” as though there is an absolute standard for beauty. How very “mature” and “wise” of you. Yet another reason as to why a lot of people love our community. We are so self entitled with our definition of beauty. And everyone, of course, loves people who know how to push their opinion as fact. =) Good for you.

          1. LOL you totally missed the point.
            I gave a technical explanation of what i see everyday as part of my job,no need to act all sensitive,if you have a better explanation with “real” numbers,please share.
            Besides get over yourself because this has nothing to do with sexuality,communities you belong to or personal preferences…when beauty is A JOB,you treat it as it is,a standard and every job has its own.
            Grow up and stop acting like your opinions are in jeopardy of being monopolized by mine.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top