Here’s the PSA just sent to me anonymously (really, you guys, just use your own e-mail address, I’ll protect your identity!), though I guess if I were looking on YouTube for ads about condoms and HIV as opposed to “comedy” videos from fat rednecks and lip syncing child midgets, I could’ve found it myself. It’s from adult film director Michael Whiteacre, and this Michael Weinstein person looks sort of awful!
The notion of making condoms mandatory in adult films is, of course, futile (studios will simply move out of California). So what does Weinstein have to gain? If cases of HIV contracted on the sets of adult productions (which, to my knowledge, no such contraction has ever been proven) were to decrease thanks to condoms, doesn’t that mean the eventual end of Weinstein’s job (i.e., less HIV, less necessity for AHF)? Unless of course he is in bed with the condom companies and somehow profiting from them, as the ad suggests.
But it’s only a suggestion. Show me proof, please. Don’t just show pictures of condoms and say “follow the money.” Prove it! I’m just watching your PSA on the internet; why should I have to follow any money? It’s your cause, not mine. Prove to me that he’s as much of a corrupt dick as he seems to be.