Pre-Fuck Interviews: A Turn-On, Or Just Stupid?

We live in an age of internet porn in which 80 percent of what’s getting put out there is being done in the style of Sean Cody in which the models sit on a couch and chat about straight they are yet how hot they are for each other for five minutes before they get naked.

Sean Cody has been doing it this way since approximately the 1890s, and even they mix things up now with sparring sessions in the weight room, dips in the pool, etc. Also, CockyBoys has tried to lend a more arty, documentary feel to these chats, with the conversations sometimes a bit more intimate and revealing, but the effect is often the same, and I’m sure 75 percent of you scroll the scrubber-bar right over this shit or just watch it after you cum.

Anyway, I’m curious if that number is less than 75 percent, or if we’re all still into hearing our almost-anonymous, flash-in-the-pan porn models talk about themselves and their lives before they whip out their dicks. Is this still an important part of your internet porn experience? Is this a lot of repetitive, small-talk bullshit at this point (unless they have a sexy accent)? Would you rather reserve all speech for when it’s scripted and/or clever and/or sex talk along the lines of “fuck me harder, motherfucker”?

I bring you Exhibit A, which arrives Wednesday from Guys in Sweatpants, but the preview’s already online. It’s Dante barebacking for the first time with blue-eyed Lukas Grande. And regardless of what you think about the scene, I’m curious what you think about the talking. Does it in any way enhance your viewing of the fucking? The car wash thing is kind of hot, but then they do this obligatory chatting in bed about Lukas’s inane tattoos (“It’s a buncha trees… and a moth…”) that maybe should have been edited out.

 

I hesitate to compare that Exhibit B from Sean Cody, featuring Tanner and Parker, because that involves a Slip ‘N’ Slide and therefore it’s obviously hotter, and not a couch interview.

 
So, what do you think?

 

[Guys In Sweatpants: Dante Rails Lukas]
[Sean Cody: Parker and Tanner]

24 thoughts on “Pre-Fuck Interviews: A Turn-On, Or Just Stupid?”

    1. This is the smarter way to go, given all the “straight” talk/lies. The fantasy was what porn was about for us gays before social media and “legs in the air” of straights/tops with girlfriends waiting out in the car, who become bottoms two scenes later.

  1. I like to learn more about the guys but I prefer the interviews to be separate like behind the scenes content or to come after the fucking. Lucasentertainment has had interviews prior to the fucking on two of its recent bareback scenes with Adam Killian being the interviewer.

  2. When I was a member of Dirty Tony, I was very intrigued by the model interviews they show first, before the sex. Now, I don’t know if what the model says are the truth or bullshit.

  3. Some times a voice like paddy Obrien or Liam riley can ruin it. Other times, it’s just so fake its laughable. Depends on the models and the scene and the fantasy. Some get off on the str8 or I boys or even hearing the masculine brother voices. Some like to hear it when it’s a boyfriend porn with real lovers.

  4. Some times a voice like paddy Obrien or Liam riley can ruin it. Other times, it’s just so fake its laughable. Depends on the models and the scene and the fantasy. Some get off on the str8 or I boys or even hearing the masculine brother voices. Some like to hear it when it’s a boyfriend porn with real lovers.

  5. Some people like it, some don’t. Depend how it’s done. More models these days are trying to create broader brands & connect with their ‘fans’ on social media. It can work to help personalize them. It’s one thing if its fake scripted jibberish & another if its true banter that might tell you more about the midels’ relationships, attraction or set up the scene. It works sometimes on CB esp when the models are gay and have some connection outside of the scene. Most people forward thru something anyway. If a scene is hot, my St won’t make it through 20 min let alone 2 hour film without climax

  6. With today’s horrible gay porn, the interview is usually the best part of the scene.
    But I enjoy the interviews when they are real and the performers don’t put on some act or are advertising their website or something. If a guy is a true amateur sometimes I like to see what is in his head. But this only applies if it is something kinky. If it is some flip flop boring scene, I could care less what his favorite color is.

  7. I like the small talk if the guys don’t act like tools. Some of them are humorous (Sean Cody’s Calvin and Ashton). I think we truly got a tiny glimpse into Calvin’s personality. The Corbin Fisher models need to be muzzled entirely. Josh’s and Dru’s “profile” videos made me throw up in my mouth a little. Ty’s video was pretty hot, because he had substance. I don’t think there’s a good answer to this question… If they’re genuine and have something interesting to say, sure. If they’re d-bags, nope. Some of them sound so stupid…

    1. “Dude,” you’re so right. Didn’t know about these “Intro” videos that offers more contradictory statements, prepared ones! Dru: “I like to date, get laid. I do what comes natural.” I see, he’s bisexual. Then it’s, “I’m straight,” kissing a guy is scuffy,” etc. Not a pleasant way to earn money, especially when you say you love being away to relax (I assume dealing with being with a girl and all that does with that! But loves being with Conner, etc. and wants to get with [sexually] another performer in the stable he has not had the pleasure….

  8. Since the 1890’s??? I guess there are some elder gays who are still around that can remember that far back. Lukas Grande is hot. But I don’t like tattoos. I like the before and after talking, sometimes it can annoying, but overall I think it adds to the atmosphere, especially when it becomes obvious if there is sexual chemistry between the two models or not. Case in point; Noel’s obvious attraction to Stu in their Sean Cody scene.

  9. I actually really like the interviews, analysing why I think it gives an insight into the models personalitys, now I eould agree that sometimes it can be a mistake, but more often then not it adds an extra dimension to the sex.

  10. I scrub right through that shit. Chemistry in a porn should be able to supersede their words, their throbbing dicks in asses should tell the viewer how much they want each other. I find with the the pre-interviews, especially with the ‘straight’ guys, it can ruin the mood if you will, to hear such stilted dialogue. It’s like, I don’t want to hear about your imaginary girlfriend right before you start sucking on some guy’s penis.

  11. I think they’re very important and help the potential of the scene. It’s better to get an idea of their personalities before they do it otherwise we’re just watching human dildo mannequins rub against each other. No connection, no eroticism. And they often reveal aspects about their personality that we probably wouldn’t have known about. I don’t like scenes without the pre-sex interview.

  12. It really depends what they say. If they’re charming or smartish, that really turns me on. If they talk about being excited about the scene, about how much they’re into their scene partner, that’s awesome. If they talk about how much they love tits, not so much.

    1. I couldn’t agree more. I love the conversations that gives a glimpse of likable personality. I want to at least imagine they are doing this for fun as well as the money. That illusion is broken the moment they share their J-Lo fantasy. Bisexuality I can get with but I don’t need to hear how they have to struggle to do it with a guy.

      1. Ditto. I want to hear their voice. I want to hear about boyfriends and their sex lives. About coming out and being proud. If they are straight, nah. Go away. The problem is that is the focus of SC interviews, being straight. They never get to talk about being gay. That site is so homophobic. I’m proud of being gay and want to hear others talk about it.

        Michael Lucas does them the best.

        I usually scroll through the endless sucking or the fake moans to get to the intense fucking or cumshots. I like the kissing and sucking but not endless. I also like the striptease. Take the clothes off slowly pls.

        1. I’m with you BIGRAWTOP! Well, except for the “raw” part! Hey, BIGTOP has a sexy, but powerful ring to it.

  13. I’m sure there’s a way to do a good pre-fucking interview that shows off the models’ personalities in a positive light and sets up their chemistry.

    …Sadly this never happens because 1) the models have no chemistry or personality, and/or 2) the interviewer can’t interview for shit and talks too much as if people are watching the video to hear him talk.

    1. You pretty much nailed it! I will just expand further by says much of the problem is the “interviewer” ask questions that aren’t true, but fits the brand. Two pathetic examples come courtesy of “Baitbuddies” – just updates is James Hamilton who has been top, bottom, tortured, etc. for about a decade who says he’s been “straight,” “gay4pay,” etc., but then simply says “I like to fuck gays, and I like to fuck girls!” The audio got a little less clear as he continued: Sounded like he said, “but I couldn’t be in a relationship with a guy,” or words to that effect. Interviewer/owner Caruso let’s us know that James has a girlfriend, not that anyone asked! Caruso goes on to insist (in the description of the scene that the girlfriend doesn’t mine, but expect James to not “GIVE IT AWAY FOR FREE!!!” The way I see it: both guys got paid with orgasms. Drake gave better than he got! Why the “girlfriend” should get “paid,” I leave you guys to school me?

        1. Oh, forgot my other example (sorry, long day at work): Also on “Baitbuddies”: One of the “Bait” boys, when asked, what do you find attractive about “straight” guys? His answer was, “They have big muscles!” No, I did not make this up. Lol!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top