On the left, a still from SamuelOToole.com; on the right, from Falcon’s Guys Next Door.
One more comparison:
Again, from SamuelOToole.com on the left and Falcon on the right. Is someone at Falcon a Photoshop wizard/crazy size queen, or did Samuel O’Toole’s cock actually grow two inches this year?
To be sure, every studio uses Photoshop. We use it on models in Golden Gate. Not only does it help with models suffering from baby dick, it also clears up blemishes, stray hairs, unsightly wrinkles, and other unmentionables. That being said, of all the penises to use Photoshop on, Samuel O’Toole’s penis is not the one! We all know how big and perfect it is without any special effects, so making it bigger just looks silly.
And while we’re on the subject of how perfect he is, I’ve been so dickmatized by him that I never noticed how great his ass is, too?
AND:
Watch Sammy fuck Paul Wagner in Guys Next Door:
[Falcon: Samuel O’Toole Fucks Paul Wagner]
I think samuel o tool is hot and love the big dick of his
es muito bom na cama
Did some research, turns out he’s named Muscle Eddie.
Click this link; http://uddermen.tumblr.com/post/50677037680/47avenue-muscle-eddie-big-eddie-check-it-out
I would be kind of interesting and hot if there was some girlfriend out there who was turned on at the sight of her boyfriend doing it with guys–we see plenty of guys with this attitude, so why not women?
Plus with a monster like that, you KNOW some chick is bouncing on it at home!
I think he has a hidden girlfriend. The PR keeps saying he is single, and bi, but I think that is fabricated. Sex operators use persona to create fantasies… i think porn stars do the same.
However in this case…I hate that…I mean, I wouldn’t like it if a gay guy kept his relationship secret or be on the ‘DL,’ So why should I like it if a straight person does the same thing?
looks like he does:
http://menofporn.typepad.com/menofporn/2011/11/from-rh-on-next-door-studios-free-cam-show-models-are-quite-often-no-shows.html
Alex: You’re an idiot without knowledge. I have never retouched any photo in the 2 1/2 years I have worked for NDS. I give the photos to the NDS office and they might take a blemish off a face but they do not make dicks bigger. In the ten years I worked for Falcon I never retouched any of my photos. The art department there was another story. They retouched everyone and everything. They were truly photoshop queens.
wow rude….you may personally have never retouched your photos,but fact is someone does and that’s what the user u called idiot was referring to.it’s true that the secret to a good shot is lighting and that lights alone can make the difference and you have proven to be probably the best at that in the business but major skin imperfections,pimps and more visible marks you can see in videos and not in the shoots have been clearly retouched.I also remember a couple of models who have “small” dicks,sporting a bigger one in your pictures,yes it could be angle and lighting but still,it literally takes a second to erase a pimp and 3 to make a dick bigger.
Hey, who doesn’t like a little photoshop?
The question being asked here is a good one, but I think the bigger question is: When will Samuel O’Toole bottom?
NEVER!
Sam is one of those types that think anal is more intimate and worth doing, with someone he is comfortable or in love with. I even think that way sometimes… Then I realize that there isn’t any intimacy associated with sex at all, so what is the problem? Oh yea, douching.
Fuck All of you, what if he never bottom . if you don’t like it then go watch something else the porn already full with bottoms ass
Yes, why make him the poster boy of photoshop. This happens with every porn star. I used to say this about Matt Rush all the time.
I like photoshop. I use it all the time on myself. It helps, believe me… but it does leave room for abuse.
Falcon’s always photo-shopped, as well as post inaccurate measurements from their models. They’ve done it for Matthew Rush from the very beginning. I can’t remember who, but while reading the stats on their website they had MR have a longer dick than another porn star, while it was obvious that the other porn star had a longer dick than MR.
Realmente me parece una estupidez el agrandar una verga solo por promociòn, si luego al verse el video la realidad salta por si sola. Pero bueno…serà marketing de los estudios. Ademas hay una realidad cierta: “POR MAS GRANDE QUE LA TENGAS, SI NO LA SABÈS USAR NO TE SIRVE DE NADA EL TAMAÑO”. Y crèanme que muchos son totalmente apàticos, aburridos y frios a la hora de coger, por màs gtande que sea la pija que poseen.
Mi humilde opiniòn
Do they CGI his dick bigger in the actual video, too?
I wish my dick would be photo-shopped. I look like I have 5″ peen. Unfortunately, some of you are generalizing. Not every studio photo shops.
They might not Photoshop to make dicks look bigger at NDS but Mick Hicks sure as hell retouches those photos. So of those models faces, backs, and asses look like the library at Perkins School for the Blind in the videos but in the stills perfect skin. Make-up only covers so much.
Then again isn’t Falcon really just Next Door now anyway.
*some of
He’s got one of those Rick Donovan soft-ons. I’d happily give up an inch or two for a dick that pointed north and actually looked HARD.
Not only did they photoshop a bigger dick but they also smoothed out his face. Either that or he is wearing a bunch of makeup.
all dicks get the photo shop treatment in porn.
Mostly really badly.
Uh, yeah. Like I said, “Every studio uses Photoshop.”
Wow, for something interesting, someone should start a before and after photoshop. Kind of like Stars without makeup. I mean would the studios lose that many customers?
I wonder which Golden Gate denizens Zach thinks has a “baby dick”. Gavin Waters would qualify. Who else?
You can still have a big dick and suffer from “baby dick” at any given time, depending on a variety of contributing factors (climate, body temperature, lack of sexual arousal, etc.).
Also, the fact that Gavin Waters is like a half a person taller than Sammy might have something to do with their seeming discrepancies in endowment.