Steven Daigle’s Next Trick: Straight For Pay

After last night’s John Magnum post, this makes two “straight” entries in a row. Welcome to the GayVN-winning The Sword, your new home for pussy.

Here’s Steven Daigle (going bareback?) with two women from “Straight Guys For Gay Eyes.”

I can’t.

 

 

 

 

67jbuncensored__oPt

33jb__oPt

43jb__oPt

48jb__oPt

(via)

25 thoughts on “Steven Daigle’s Next Trick: Straight For Pay”

  1. The reason some of you don’t like this sort of thing is because you are the stereotypical fag queen with the limp wrist, bad lisp, shitty attitude, placing yourselves on pedestals, and judging all the rest around you hypocritically. Oh nooooo a vag!?! You fucking crawled out of a vag on your birthday.

    The loudest fags are the stereotypes. But there are many of us in silent majority (not in the closest, but certainly not prancing around like fucking fools) that like to see men act like men, and fuck. Whether they fuck a man, or a woman, we like it, cause it is real, or looks real enough to get off to. It’s porn.

    If you come to a porn site and bash the actor as a prostitute, or that they fuck a women, why the fuck you click a link knowing what you would see? How fucking stupid is the damn population? Oh wait. We all know that answer.

    And the bareback issue is a joke. Porn gets tested regularly and they take a small risk knowingly. Meanwhile, the casual daily fag thinks he is clean cause he got tested “sometime last year” and only slipped up a few times but “they said they were clean, or tested recently or whatever, and I trust them”. Add those people up a few million times and you have a bunch of clueless retards more at risk then a tested porn actor. And if you are the one that never slips up? Good for you, half the fags you fuck with are

  2. If he’s not blacklisted for going bareback, then all the condom studios are full of shit. It does make me feel like a “second class citizen in my own porn”.

    If he can do it for SGFGE he can do it for Cocksure. He must think gay men are all diseased.

    1. I hope so. I once thought Steven was kinda hot & likable as the cute, gay cowboy guy from Big Brother. When he started performing in porn I began to think of him as an annoying, porn-star crazed uber-fan party boy. He’s definitely not at the level or caliber of major stars. I don’t want him to last much longer in the porn biz.

      If this is the end, I say good riddance.

  3. This is disgusting! Straight for pay??? Come on! We all know the “gay for pay” are really gay! Having gay porn boys fuck women is just another setback in the straight worlds belief that we can change if we wanted to. Steven, grown up and get a real fucking job!

    1. Well said! A HUGE setback. It’s bad enough that so many gay porn performers identify as “straight.” I’d much rather watch two gay men have passionate sex because they’re gay and into each other than some dumb jock (badly) pretend to like getting fucked while holding/ covering up his limp dick the whole time.

      Now the gay ones are going and fucking women? Huge turn off. AND bareback? Double vom.

  4. I was a huge fan of Steven Daigle. After this story….not so much. Why is it necessary for gay pornstars to go to these lengths?

    1. “Why is it necessary for gay pornstars to go to these lengths?”

      $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

  5. NEW POST! I’m in a sling! And Marianne is fucking me with a huge add-on! But wait! she’s hot and nasty and has hairy legs too! And Trent is, well, where the fuck is Trent…..Ahaha!

    1. We are not ‘uptight’ about sex, we are ‘gay’. Do you remember what that means? We like men sexually and find women anything from sexually unappealing to repulsive. Why would we be interested in this or find this a good thing? Clearly Daigle isnt as repulsed by women as many of the gay guys here is. Thats fine, but no one should expect us to like it just because some other ‘vaguely gay’ guy does.

      At best this is just unnecessary and gross, at worst it gives the ex-gay wing-nuts ammunition against us.

      1. “Why would we be interested in this or find this a good thing?” Well, why you personally may or may not find it a good thing only you can speak to, but to answer your question in general, from my perspective, the reason why “we” would find this interesting, even if we are gay: Is because the definition of “gay” is changing, and has been for some time. It is no longer as rigid as some have traditionally thought, and it does not need for the men who call themselves by its name to be repulsed by the idea of having sex with a woman. Sex is great! Why, your momma and your daddy had that same kind of sex. Why be repulsed at something that makes people happy? It mirrors the way hets convulse when they see two guys holding hands in the park.

        I think alot of gays are giving up on the need to vilify a woman’s anatomy just to uphold some fascist definition of what “gay” is. The gay community has always thrived in diversity — has always pushed boundaries. Fucking with gender roles and inverting power relationships are part and parcel of what has been so great about our community for so long. Gays experimenting with sex with women, even (and especially) as spectacle, in front of the camera, is an interesting development. If a queen like Steven Daigle can have fun with two hot women and fuck around and play and laugh and still be gay and feel like a whole person, what’s the big fucking deal?

        Clearly it’s a huge deal or there wouldn’t be all this bellyaching over a 30 minute porn of three people smiling and fucking — not hurting each other — but just playing around. And I guarantee you — if it turns out that “none of us is gay anymore” — then none of us will be straight anymore either. It was always going to be both ways. And it will be scary and confusing, but it’s happening.

        1. Neil again, you must not get out much. Gay men don’t vilify a woman’s anatomy, none of your comments are based in fact but in conjecture and baseless comments. The definition of gay isn’t changing, just because you see something that happens in porn doesn’t mean it’s happening in society. When you understand that then get back with us.

          This is porn Neil, saying that Steven fucking a woman is changing how gay men see sexuality and what they are attracted to is ridiculous. Find a straight men who sees two straight men fucking and says to himself “I think I want to do that” then we will talk.

          People are repulsed by the hypocrisy of him not using a condom with his female scene partners but using one with his male partners even thought at Jake Cruise bareback scenes are tested just like like heterosexual ones.

          I guess being a rent a whore with David Forest isn’t that lucrative for Steven these days.

  6. Then again, if I were pushing forty and had I found porn at 38, I’d take anything that might be thrown at me. You’ve already ruined most opportunities in the real world (no pun intended) so better step up to the cash while the bank is open.

  7. I’m a fan of straight porn as long as the guy’s appealing, but it does strike me as ridiculously hypocritical when you have a studio doing bareback straight sex but condoms in gay scenes, using the same actors, marketed for the same audience.
    Granted, porn isn’t really the place to discuss political correctness, but it’s depressing when even in your own porn, you’re second class.

  8. I’m all for equality, but honestly this turns me off of Steven. It turned me off of Arpad when he did it. I haven’t purchased or watched any of his videos since. I’m afraid it will be the same for Steven. Oh well, who’s next?

    1. simply, because it is. AND. there really is no reason to be gay any longer. There is no money in gay porn for gay porn stars, and there is probably even less for people like Zach Sire who covers it and writes about it.

      before you know it, none of us will be gay anymore and none of us will have to be worried about getting married! Or anything else related to NoH8.

  9. Haha… thanks, Zach. We had a LOT of fun shooting that scene and it’s been a long time since I laughed that much shooting porn. Steven delivers an incredible performance and he’ll have a lot of his fans scratching their heads at the whole thing. But score one for our team… if straight guys can go gay for pay, us gay guys are free to go play their game and beat them on their own home court, dammit. haha..

    1. Ha ha ha…you’re laughing all the way to the bank, aren’t you, Jasun?

      Speaking of money, let’s have a reality check, shall we?

      1) There is no such thing as a “gay” porn star, only a porn star.

      2) Porn stars are all basically prostitutes who will pretty much fuck anybody for a paycheck. Daigle is no different.

      3) Jasun Mark is a pornographer who cares about nothing more than promoting his own product, which in turn lines his pocketbook.

      4) Barebacking double standards? Everybody got a paycheck, right? So who cares?

      I think that pretty much covers it. Carry on.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 50 MB. You can upload: image. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here

Scroll to Top