With only five days to go, the time for action is now. Passage of Prop 60 would not only classify porn as we know it illegal, it endangers the people the make it.
From reduced donut consumption to even lighter attendance reported at NFL games, election angst has gripped the country.
Passage of Prop 60 would create Michael Weinstein as a Porn Czar with authority of over that of the California Attorney General. He, in turn, would then have the authority over everyone’s porn and the health of those who make it.
Ryan Rose, Brent Corrigan, Trenton Ducati, Topher Dimaggio, Scott Riley, JJ Knight, Seth Santoro, and Jeremy Spreadums are just some of the gay porn stars urging you to Vote No On Prop 60.
Penthouse has chimed in with their own look at the matter.
Contrary to the misleading commercials, the last HIV outbreak in the adult industry was 12 years ago.
Here are just two of the ways Prop 60 would endanger the lives of all adult performers
1) By deputizing every California resident as part of the condom police, this leaves all adult performers susceptible to stalkers and others with negative intentions to find out personal information about them. “It immediately becomes part of the public record, and there isn’t any real way to prevent that,” The Sword co-founder Mike Stabile told Heavy.com.
2) Michael Weinstein professes Prop 60 will protect performers. The reality is the health screenings that would be mandated will place them at a higher risk in the following ways:
A) Currently, adult performers are tested free of charge every two weeks via the Performer Availability Scheduling Services (PASS) System. Prop 60 would reduce that to only before they are about to make a film.
B) PASS’s protocol includes the Aptima HIV-1RNA Qualitative Assay Test which shows infections as early as 7-10 days. But in the HIV Antibodies test that would be prescribed by Weinstein under Prop 60; antibodies show after 22 or more days.
